"The question is not a question of
who you are to others, but who you
are to yourself."
-said by a person who has been
selected to enslave you with
random, meaningless, useless
quotes said by people no one has
heard of (which is contradictary,
within itself, due to the
undeniable fact that the person
who said this is in an
unidentifyable viscious circle of
retoric.) Ergo, the previous
comments are entirely irrelevent,
and should not be considered
logical, and, in all probability,
written by a happy little monkey.
I conlude my statement with this:
If I, an unidentifyable person
were to have made such accusations
as illogical doings to another
unidentifyable person, within the
same brainstorm, wouldn't one
suspect the fact that the
illogical person is the one
writing the words you are seeing
right now. In that case, I am
refering to myself in the third
person. So, I could speak to
myself using such fictional words
like syntactical. Syntactical, in
my own little bizzaro world, might
mean something like: the lack of
syntax, grammatical error, or,
complete stupidity. Complete
stupidity might by defined by a
person who has actually followed
me to the end long enough to
realize the full potential of my
senslessness, and your bordem.
Thereby redering both of us,
myself, and you, the reader, left
to be judged based on the result
of what we have learned here
today. Who likes to be judged
though: The question is not a
question of who you are to others,
but who you are to yourself.
-Jimmy
Jimmy what the hell was that all
about dam you have alot of time
Steven
Thank you Steven. you should have
seen Adam and I's conversation.
It had everything from binary talk
to string ensembles.
-Jimmy
Hey man, it looks good on paper.
Maybe something like "The
conversation Adam and I had."
Would that work for you?!
Back To Random Writings
Home